Sunday, February 18, 2007

Blindness by Jose Saramago

Whither human nature - are we naturally good or do we lean toward evil - is a question as old as asking. All people ponder it and most who pick up the pen will, at some point, address it more deliberately. Enter Nobel laureate Jose Saramago and his book, Blindness.

Saramago's enterprise is to wonder aloud about who we really are, and so he follows the old proverbial wisdom and plunges his characters into the honesty of crisis: a pandemic of unexplainable and incurable white blindness. Are we the government, motivated by expediency to quarantine the stricken, even if to do so requires that we also dehumanize them? Are we a certain segment of the quarantined, drunk enough on the "will to power" to become murderous and marauding, wolves to our fellow men and women? Or are we the optometrist's wife, whose vision never fades and whose desire to shepherd the afflicted produces innumerable tiny acts of heroism? It is not at all clear precisely whom Saramago thinks we are, but it is easy to guess who he wants us to be.

Of course, to so clearly distinguish characters and groups would be to do the author a disservice. Saramago's writing is light on things like quotation marks and names that would make identification easy. His style is almost deliberately vague, and even the characters themselves acknowledge how superfluous names are in a world full of the blind. And even as anonymity makes possible all sorts of things - not all of them atrocities - enough constants remain to separate the heroes from the villains.

There is much scattered wisdom in Blindness, and as one so oft seduced by ideas I found myself sometimes just bouncing from one concept to the next. If all one could pull out of this book were some of those quotable pockets of thought, it would still be worth reading.

2 comments:

Unknown said...

(I am momentarily stunned by the fact that, when leaving a comment, the screen asks me to "choose an identity".)

This book sounds very interesting, especially after coming off of Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?. A friend of my brother's once said that if he could lose any sense, it would be sight, only to discover what our other senses would do in compensation.

It seems that the "bad things happen, govt. does crazy shit thing" has been very prevalent in our movie-viewing/book-reading lately.

Cappy said...

Aristotle would disagree with your brother's friend. While he acknowledged sense expereience as vital, he claimed we love our ability to see most of all.